164
164
Aug 1, 2013
08/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 164
favorite 0
quote 0
yesterday they had the head of the nsa reaching out to this community. a lot of the folks here tell us they've seen upset about what they've seen in its revelations about what the nsa has been doing. but facing heckling from the crowd during his comments yesterday, we caught up with him in a hallway outside of the event just after -- here's what he told us. >> do you think edward snowden should be able to stay here? >> sl or do you think he should come back and face justice? >> absolutely. >> a lot of people support snowden, they like what he's done here. others, a lot of folks here are contractors, they work for the federal government and for the department of homeland security. they're skeptical about snowden. >> eamon javers, we appreciate it. >> okay. what's going to happen with the upcoming summit? how do you read that? >> obama thought that improvement of relations with russia is his big achievement. now we see it exploding in his face. it's not just snowden. we are on opposite sides of the political divide on syria. the russians are doing nothing
yesterday they had the head of the nsa reaching out to this community. a lot of the folks here tell us they've seen upset about what they've seen in its revelations about what the nsa has been doing. but facing heckling from the crowd during his comments yesterday, we caught up with him in a hallway outside of the event just after -- here's what he told us. >> do you think edward snowden should be able to stay here? >> sl or do you think he should come back and face justice?...
151
151
Aug 16, 2013
08/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 151
favorite 0
quote 0
with the nsa they have to be right 1,000% of the time. terrorists have to being right 1% of the time. >> government people will make mistakes. we know that. the problem is people didn't know they were doing that. >> you can't have more transparency with the nsa because if we have more transparency then the bad guys know what we're doing. >> transparency to congress, transparency to the oversight court. you have to make sure there's somebody who is looking over other than the president. >> the problem with that the nsa says of course we'll give it to congress, 535 members of congress will leak it. >> you give to it the intelligence committee chair and the intelligence court. >> these are spooks who spy on spook whose are paranoid about themselves. >> all the more reason they shouldn't be trusted with this information without some sort of oversight. >> all that and we find out what area 51 was all about. no big deal after all. said big deal. guys thank you both for joining us tonight. i appreciate it. >>> will next week be as bad for stocks
with the nsa they have to be right 1,000% of the time. terrorists have to being right 1% of the time. >> government people will make mistakes. we know that. the problem is people didn't know they were doing that. >> you can't have more transparency with the nsa because if we have more transparency then the bad guys know what we're doing. >> transparency to congress, transparency to the oversight court. you have to make sure there's somebody who is looking over other than the...
129
129
Aug 2, 2013
08/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 129
favorite 0
quote 0
all want to be safe and secure, but the whole issue here and the beginning issue here is about the nsa data and that is when senator paul went ballistic and chris christie went ballistic back. so after iraq, after afghanistan, after, after, after. we've got syria, we have iran and egypt right now. does a senator rand paul who is more from the libertarian isolationist wing, does he make a little bit more hay on this than say a john mccain or chris christie wants him to? >> clearly, rand paul and chris christie are both very talented public servients. these are both men who can provide leadership on these issues and this is the kind of debate that i am confident to have in the hands of people like this. we really do want -- you don't want to answer the question. >> they're the kind of guys -- >> i want to see if they both come and campaign for you. after that non-answer you should have christie and you should have senator paul campaign with you. keith boynkin, who will win this battle? >> not the nan hayworth battle, but the battle with the party. >> i think right now the libertarians an
all want to be safe and secure, but the whole issue here and the beginning issue here is about the nsa data and that is when senator paul went ballistic and chris christie went ballistic back. so after iraq, after afghanistan, after, after, after. we've got syria, we have iran and egypt right now. does a senator rand paul who is more from the libertarian isolationist wing, does he make a little bit more hay on this than say a john mccain or chris christie wants him to? >> clearly, rand...
173
173
Aug 5, 2013
08/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 173
favorite 0
quote 0
this is from some insiders like peter king and other people from the intelligence community and the nsa and so forth, people are saying this is the most chatter that we've picked up since 9/1,1 actually since before 9/11. what does that mean? >> i think there are three points that need to be. one, clearly the presidential campaign of barack obama was false in saying that al qaeda was degraded two, the speech in may declaring the war on terror over was wrong. three, after benghazi, they don't want to keep the same mistake to keep americans in harm's way. four, as wes indicated, we've got good intelligence, but this is a tough, difficult business of engaging in this war on terror. the administration is taking the right kind of precautions. but we have to hold our breath and we have show we're not disengaged and that is a pattern that has to change with the u.s. government over the last couple years. >> peter brooks, is the government of pakistan or at least the secret service of pakistan giving al zawahiri all kinds of comfort and help and you think they're giving him resources for his ca
this is from some insiders like peter king and other people from the intelligence community and the nsa and so forth, people are saying this is the most chatter that we've picked up since 9/1,1 actually since before 9/11. what does that mean? >> i think there are three points that need to be. one, clearly the presidential campaign of barack obama was false in saying that al qaeda was degraded two, the speech in may declaring the war on terror over was wrong. three, after benghazi, they...
161
161
Aug 23, 2013
08/13
by
CNBC
tv
eye 161
favorite 0
quote 0
they've had the opportunity to go ballistic about benghazi and the irs and the nsa, and they've suspended the debt ceiling in february and they learned their lesson and they'll stop yapping about legitimate rate and shutting down the government and all of that stuff and they'll guide into a classic midterm election where they'll make gains in the senate and gains in the house and then they'll go into a classic presidential election in 2016 when history teaches us that pretty much, every two terms the white house changes party. it is the gop's term and it is president christie's turn. all they have to do is shut up for the next three years and that is their policy. they know that. that's not bullish this year, that is so bullish for 2016. >> okay. 2016. >> but jim muriel, i'll just say this. we'll have a more detailed discussion of obama care and the republicans' fiscal policy later in the show, but i'll say this. no shutdown means you will have an orderly situation come this fall. that's got to be good. >> boehner and cantor will not want to fiddle with the debt ceiling and that's got to
they've had the opportunity to go ballistic about benghazi and the irs and the nsa, and they've suspended the debt ceiling in february and they learned their lesson and they'll stop yapping about legitimate rate and shutting down the government and all of that stuff and they'll guide into a classic midterm election where they'll make gains in the senate and gains in the house and then they'll go into a classic presidential election in 2016 when history teaches us that pretty much, every two...